Everyday Contexts of Camera Phone Use: Steps Toward Technosocial Ethnographic Frameworks. Daisuke Okabe Keio University PDF Everyday Contexts of Camera Phone Use Steps itofisher itofisher mito archives camphones okabeito pdf PDF Camera phone use in social context Semantic Scholar pdf s semanticscholar d314cee9ef3ddb18b5c57e67f9cb512af3cd pdf
PDF Everyone's Business Investigating the resettlement needs of black lemosandcrane co uk Government 20Office 20for 20the 20West 20Midlands 20 PDF Untitled UNHCR unhcr 3d464db54 pdf PDF Improving outcomes for Black and minority
Apr 29, 2000 Everything You Have Always Wanted to Know about the Playstation But Were Afraid to Ask Version 1 1 Compiled \ Edited By Joshua Walker Nov 3, 2013 Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Synchronization but Were
PDF Access Understanding Iran Everything You Need To Know, From 500mexicocity Understanding 20Iran 20Everything 20You 20Need 20to 20Know, PDF Download Galaxy S7 The Ultimate Beginners Guide Learn 500mexicocity Galaxy 20S7
PDF everything you need to know UK in a Changing Europe ukandeu ac uk Brexit and the backstop everything you need to know pdf PDF Everything You Need To Know About Fat Loss Paperbackftp primar everything you need to
PDF everything you need to know UK in a Changing Europe ukandeu ac uk Brexit and the backstop everything you need to know pdf PDF Access The Model's Guide Everything You Need To Know About 500mexicocity
d2oc0ihd6a5bt cloudfront wp content uploads Office 365 Everything You Wanted to Know 1 You can also find out how Office 365 can help comply with standards, laws, and regulations across industries circuitboards EverythingYouWanted pdf Although this book is entitled
Some limits to evidence based medicine a case study from elective orthopaedics Ewan Ferlie, Martin Wood, Louise Fitzgerald Abstract There has been Overview of Today's Lecture • Leah Introduction to Evidence based medicine • Johnny Vaccines and Public Health
implement evidence based practices and effective program models Client admissions to behavioral health treatment programs are based on the use of the robustness of available evidence based treatments (EBTs) for child trauma, National Registry of Evidence based Programs and Practices7 provide the most
PDF Evidence based software engineering ResearchGate researchgate Evidence based software engineering Evidence based software engineering pdf PDF Evidence based software engineering IEEE Xplore ieeexplore ieee iel5 9201 29176 01317449
xts of Camera Phone Use: Steps Toward Technosocial Ethnographic Frameworks Daisuke Okabe Keio University...
Everyday Contexts of Camera Phone Use: Steps Toward Technosocial Ethnographic Frameworks Daisuke Okabe Keio University Mizuko Ito University of Southern California and Keio University To appear in: Höflich,
Berlin: Frank & Timme Introduction A friend you have not seen for a while,
gorgeous parfait at a new café,
a classmate who has just fallen into a puddle,
a child opening wide for a spooned-in mouthful,
or a miniature milk package on an airline tray
pets and objects in the flow of everyday life.
and particularly at tourist spots,
the sounds of the camera phone’s shutter have become an unremarkable part of the setting.
already it feels like a familiar presence.
It is the latest portable media technology to become commonplace,
one more component of the layered information and media ecologies that overlay our everyday experience in urban Japan.
based on a diary study of usage patterns.
we briefly describe the current state of camera phone adoption in Japan,
and introduce our methodology and conceptual framework for this study.
We frame our study as an example of adapting traditional anthropological approaches to the study of everyday practices that are distributed across real and virtual settings.
The body of the paper describes emergent practices of camera phone use in Japan,
providing concrete examples from the ethnographic material.
though we are beginning to see some usage patterns stabilizing.
There are indicators of practices of picture taking and sharing that differ both from the uses of the stand-alone camera and the kinds of social sharing that happened via mobile phone communication (Kato,
Okabe and Ito 2003).
Camera Phone Adoption and Research Built-in camera functions are now a popular and accepted add-on to the mobile phone.
The camera phone is part of an overall trend towards non-voice functions in the mobile.
Recent years have seen a shift to email as the dominant modality for mobile communication,
now exchanged more frequently than calls in Japan (Matsuda 2005
this email exchange is coming to include photos and moving images.
In October 2000,
J-Phone (now Vodafone) launched its first camera-
the introduction of a terminal with the “Sha-mail”(photo mail) function by J-Phone in November 2000 changed mobile phone practice,
making it possible to send each other photographs with the mobile phone.
According to estimates by the Telecommunication Carriers Association (TCA),
camera phones now comprise over 60% of all mobile phones in use in Japan.
The trend is towards camera phones becoming a standard feature of mobile phones and it is clear that they are here to stay.
particularly in the resolution of images.
and they might include features such as auto focus,
and removable memory card (Kato,
some survey work is indicating certain patterns of usage.
In a multiple-choice survey by japan.internet.com (2003) asked how they used photos taken by their camera phones,
almost 90% of respondents answered that they “view them on their handset,” followed by “use them as wallpaper for their mobile phone” at almost 60%,
with “email them to friends and family” at over 50%,
and “upload them to a PC” trailing at 35%.
found that 65% reported using a camera phone.
“In what kinds of settings and for what purposes to you actually use the camera function
?” the most common answer (75%) was “recording and commemorating moments with family,
acquaintances,” followed by “recording and commemorating interesting or unusual things in everyday life” (69%) and “travel photos such as of scenery” (39%).
we are just beginning to see the emergence of an international empirical corpus on related usage patterns.
Most of the early qualitative studies of camera phone use have been based on quasi-experimental methods that involve providing image capture and sending technologies to users (Koskinen 2005
or reducing some of the barriers to image capture and sharing among existing users (Ito 2005a
the approach tends to be focused on anticipating future uses of technical capacities that are not yet well established as consumer technologies (see Koskinen 2005).
like Oksman’s chapter in this volume and the work of C.
Licoppe in France (2004),
our work described here represents naturalistic observations of camera phone usage among existing users.
Because Japan is among the first national contexts to have widespread popular adoption of camera phones,
we have been in a unique position to conduct more naturalistic observations of an emergent but popularly adopted set of technologies.
we have taken a more experimental approach in piloting a new set of technological capabilities among existing camera phone users (Ito 2005a).The state of the field in camera phone research is indicative of the social study of new technologies more generally,
which tends to hybridize future-oriented methods from technology design with methods from the social sciences which have traditionally focused on the study of existing social patterns.
we use our study of camera phone usage as a way of illustrating a particular form of methodological hybridization that focuses on the strengths of an anthropological method,
while also responding to ongoing
changes to the technologies underlying our social activity.
our work is focused on documenting existing practices rather than designing for new ones,
but we hope to demonstrate the relevance of our approach in uncovering resilient patterns of behavior that can inspire reconsideration of technosocial engineering.
Research Design Our Studies Our research on camera phone grows is part of a broader research program that is examining the use of portable ICTs in urban Japan,
centered at Keio Shonan Fujisawa Campus near Tokyo.
with exploratory interviews with college and high school students.
we designed a diary-based study of mobile phone use reported on elsewhere (Ito 2005b
Ito and Okabe 2005) and adapted from the study reported in Grinter and Eldridge (2001).
This method of study relies heavily on self-documentation and self-reflection on the part of the participant.
We begin with a preinterview to get basic background information and train the participants in the selfdocumentation process.
Participants are asked to note every instance of mobile phones use and the context in which the usage occurred.
who they were in contact with,
whether they received or initiated the contact,
what kind of communication type was used,
why they chose that form of communication,
who was in the vicinity at the time,
if there were any problems associated with the usage,
and the content of the communication.
After the period of selfdocumentation,
we conduct an in-depth interview where we gather more information about their ICT habits,
and go over the content of the diary in detail.
but for diary studies we have offered the equivalent of about $200 USD.
The camera phone research described here relied on an adaptation of these selfdocumentation protocols in a follow-up study focused on camera phones users.
The central body of data is a set of "camera phone diaries" and interviews collected between August-September 2003.
In addition to the content of our standard diary,
participants were asked to keep records of photos taken,
and shared off their mobile phone.
we conducted in-depth interviews to understand more detailed information about the context of camera phone use.
Our study involved two high school students (aged 17-18),
eight college students (aged 19-23),
two housewives with teenage children (in their forties),
and three professionals (aged 29-34).
The distinctiveness of our data collection method lies in the combination of detailed and contextualized observational data collected by the participants themselves,
and in-depth interviews where researchers and participants co-construct the meaning and patterns behind the observational data.
it is not realistic for an ethnographer to directly observe all of the interstitial communications and information access that mobile phone users engage with.
since we are seeking the contextual information
and situation in addition to information on communication itself.
While retaining an ethnographic commitment to capturing details of everyday behavior in the contexts that they occur,
our approach departs from a traditional anthropological method which relies on the ethnographer participating in,
and documenting behaviors and settings.
While we have conducted observational studies of mobile phone use in public transportation (Okabe and Ito 2005),
most of our research takes a personcentered rather than a location-centered approach.
While the mobile phone has significantly reshaped the logic of urban space,
we believe that the mobile phone’s primary context of meaning is located in relation to personal communication and identity.
our participants begin taking a role akin to research collaborators or assistants.
We pay them for their time and effort,
and they also have access to the data that they generate.
this does not mean vacating our role or perspective as professional researchers and social scientists in structuring and interpreting the data.
The diary provides the framework and discipline for documenting activities that laypeople would not generally document or even recall otherwise.
it is through the final interviews that we ask participants to reflect on their activities and verbalized the logic of their practices in terms of our research categories and frameworks.
Conceptual and Methodological Framework This paper builds on the conceptual framework developed in our earlier studies,
where we have examined new kinds of “technosocial situations” that are emerging through mobile phone usage,
where users assemble social situations as a hybrid of virtual and physically co-present relations and encounters (Ito and Okabe 2005).
one key technosocial situation we have identified is “ambient virtual co-presence,” where users use text messaging to inscribe a space of shared awareness of one another,
sending messages that are primarily designed to keep in touch,
rather than to communicate specific bits of information.
where we have seen similar kinds of technosocial situations emerging,
though inflected in new ways due to the visual dimension.
the situation we identify as “intimate visual co-presence” grows out of the idea of “ambient virtual co-presence” but is a more intimate and restrictive social sphere due to characteristics specific to visual sharing.
our studies represent a translation of traditional ethnographic analytic frameworks to newly technologized social practices.
Our technosocial framework has dictated our data collection methods as well are our mode of analysis.
and infrastructures for social are action are in flux,
and increasingly distributed and technologically dependent.
Certainly many types of activities can be pursued with a spatially localized form of participant observation that analyzes behavior as structured by face-to-face and physically localized interaction.
In places like Japan,
more and more social and cultural context is mediated and spatially distributed,
requiring ethnographers to capture and document these fragmented activities,
as well as develop ways of analyzing them that take into account their unique characteristics.
remote social relations and cultural contexts are
omnipresent in all settings of action,
mobilized with the touch of a keypad and always close at hand in a pocket or a handbag.
Our analytic challenge has been to retain an anthropological focus on native meaning and situated practice,
while also recognizing the importance of remote and mediated meanings and social relations.
Much of the work in technology and design studies is primarily interested in the specifics of individualized activity and interaction,
rather than on cross-cutting communal and cultural structure surrounding the activity.
most work in anthropology prioritizes settings for behavior that are spatially localized and communal rather than private,
We hybridize these approaches by developing analytic categories that are embedded in established social structures and systems of meaning,
but are newly embodied through technical mediation.
Our categories of technosocial situations emerge from the specifics of the technologically enabled activities we have observed,
but rely on meanings and structure more general than these specific situations.
our concept of newsworthiness in photo sharing grows out of the more general and longstanding of native concept of “neta” that manifests in a wide range of cultural domains.
our categories of couple intimacy and peer group interaction are not specific to camera phone usage,
but are grounded in our ethnographic understanding of the structure of Japanese society.
we try to stay true to two key anthropological tenets: The first is to take the native’s point of view (Geertz 1989) rather than mobilizing categories of meaning that are primarily analytical and have no local counterpart.
The second is to base our analysis on patterns of meaning and social structure that cross-cut domains that are institutionally distinct.
cultural categories of gender difference or personal versus public are mobilized settings ranging from educational,
and political domains (Yanagisako and Delaney 1995).
Anthropological analysis thus seeks to relate the specific situation and activity in question with resilient and generative native categories and structures.
our analytic approach differs from a strictly ethnomethodological approach that deals with activity as emergent in interaction rather than generated as part of a pre-existing social and cultural system.
Our approach also differs from certain sociological frames that seek to develop analytic or technical categories that transcend the specifics of local social and cultural structures.
but does not seek to analyze the content of these exchanges in relation to pre-existing social and cultural categories.
In a more recent study,
These categories are targeted to provide a rubric that can generalize across current and emergent technologies in order to inform design.
Kindberg et al.
creating a grid of social versus individual,
and affective versus functional in categorizing camera phone photos.
Ling and Julsrud’s (2005) analysis of genres in multimedia messaging is probably closest to the analytic approach that we take,
identifiying culturally recognizable frames for communication.
so differs from ours in the nature of the
intervention and data collection.
In contrast to design-oriented studies that seek to optimize human-device interaction and drivers of activity,
our analytic frame is oriented primarily towards understanding native contexts of meanings and frames for action.
and critique of specific technical affordances,
but this does not mean it is irrelevant for design and engineering.
Our goal is to provide descriptions that present the native point of view and the phenomenology of experience in everyday life in Tokyo,
which can ideally put designers and engineers into a local frame of understanding that may differ from their existing one.
the underlying systems of meaning and social structure woven into our categories are generative and resilient and will continue to structure emergent behaviors.
Thus even design efforts that are technology focused and don't intervene in cultural or social negotiations need to be approached as an intervention into incumbent technosocial systems.
Based on our commitments to a technosocial frame of ethnographic analysis,
we have arrived at categories of practice that are keyed to native frames for action.
and peer-to-peer news and sharing.
The first might be considered a kind of personal self-authoring practice that is unique to the visual medium of photography.
The second two are extensions of the kinds of technosocial situations we have observed in prior forms of mobile media exchange,
revolving around the sharing of information among close friends and families.
these uses conform to a more general pattern we have observed in our research towards personal,
and pedestrian forms of technology use through the use of handheld devices (Ito,
Mobile phones and camera phone use are enabling forms of communication and information access that are closely tied to the everyday,
and street-level visions of its users.
Technosocial Situations of Camphone Use Personal Archiving Compared to mobile email,
camera phones have a personal collection and archiving function.
Most photos taken by the camera phone are not sent or shown to others,
but are captured more as a personal visual archive.
Camera phones enable personal visual archiving and authoring,
a street level everyday visual viewpoint.
we saw one user snapping a photo of a job advertisement poster and another taking a picture of the titles of some books she intended to track down in the library (Figure 1).
it is at a used book district.
Lately I take photos of things I want to buy.
I did look for the book in the library.
When they are no longer needed,
these kinds of photos tend to get erased from memory.
A more common practice is to spontaneously take a photo of some scene or viewpoint on everyday life.
one 20-year-old college student snaps several pictures a day with her camera phone: a really large shell that she found on a beach
a photo of an interesting view from an escalator at a station that she frequents (Figure 2).
Figure 2: A picture of a large shell (left),
and an escalator in the station (right)
These photos of mundane scenes are indicative of an emergent practice of visually archiving an individual’s everyday life.
or particularly well-framed our thought out.
intention of possibly looking at them a little later,
recording a momentary slice of a viewpoint on everyday life.
The following photo (Figure 4) and interview is indicative of this kind of casual attitude towards photo taking.
Figure 4: A photo of a view of Yokohama Bay taken when out with a friend Okabe: This is the ocean,
? Interviewee: Yes Okabe: Were you out with a friend,
just hanging out and it was like “okay,
? Interviewee: I was just walking along and thought,
Okabe: And you got your mobile out.
Most of the photos that people take are not intended be sent to others.
In the following interview,
a college student describes a photo she took as an omamori (good luck amulet).
people often carry omamori simply to have a trusted spirit close by.
This student sees her photo as a similar kind of presence.
Iinterviewee: …There are seven students at that farewell party.
this photo is just an omamori.
camera phones occupy a unique niche.
One participant says,
“The camera phone is my eye.
but rather are highly personal viewpoints on everyday life that are archived on the small screen.
Most of our informants described a unique pleasure in building this personal viewpoint archive.
a quality that makes them even more valuable as a resource for personal identity construction.
Intimate Visual Co-Presence The photos described thus far were saved on an individual’s handset and were not shared with others.
In contrast to personal uses,
photo sharing provides a window into the organization of social relations through these new technologies.
We are finding that the sharing of photos is related but interestingly different from some of the patterns we have seen with mobile email exchange.
Many noted that sharing photos feels more “intrusive” than email,
and tend to feel more narcissistic.
This is particularly true for photo mail as a “push” modality that gets sent uninvited.
Most of the sharing we saw of photos was off the handset screens.
People would show their friends the photos they had in their phone on occasions that they got together.
In the case of mobile email,
we found that most people had regular exchanges with 2-5 others,
but not more than 10 people (Ito and Okabe 2005).
the circle for exchange tends to be even smaller and the content more selective.
We would first like to describe some examples of people sharing photos off of their handset screens.
In the following interview,
a collect student describes how he went out to Yokohama with a childhood friend,
and later showed the photos to his mother.
I we still get together.
Okabe: Why did you take it
? Interviewee: I took it thinking I would show my mom.
so you were meeting with your friend occasionally even after elementary school,
Sharing photos with close friends by showing them the keitai screen is a common practice.
There are technical and economic reasons why people don’t email photos to each other very frequently.
Generally photos cannot be sent between people subscribed to different carriers,
and the packet fees for sending photos are expensive.
in comparison to sending text messages,
sending photos is perceived as “intrusive,” and “narcissistic.” The following photo (Figure 5) and interview excerpt indicate this view.
Figure 5: Taking a photo of a new hairstyle and emailing it to her boyfriend Interviewee: I might take a quick photo of my hairstyle and check if it looks okay.
I’d take 2 or 3 and pick one that looks good and send it out asking if it looks okay.
? Interviewee: I guess to my boyfriend.
I had plans to see him the next day… If my boyfriend had a camera phone I would send it,
?” But he doesn’t have one now.
she describes how she would send a photo of a new hairstyle to a boyfriend but not to a girlfriend.
Decisions of whether to send a photo or what kind of photo to send are made based on social relationships and levels of intimacy.
This same college student made a different kind of decision with respect to a photo of some steamed sweet bean buns that she made (Figure 6).
she sent this photo out to several of her friends with the caption “Look,
!” Unlike the photo of herself,
she felt that this was something she could share with friends.
and it was a more “newsworthy” even than a new hairstyle.
sent to close friends Figure 7,
like the picture of the steamed buns,
was a picture shared between friends.
our research subject says how he feels that if it is between very close friends he feels that picture sharing is appropriate,
and he might share a picture in exchange for one received.
The photograph below was received by a female professor,
while she was away on a business trip overseas.
Her husband emailed her a camera phone photo of their son riding a two-wheeler for the first time (Figure 8).
It is an example of a photo that is newsworthy among the circle of the nuclear family,
another social unit that shares a level of intimacy comparable to couples and close friends.
Figure 7: A photo of home-made hamburger steak
Figure 8: A photo of a child riding a bike,
sent between parents Interviewee: This is a picture of some hamburger steak I made.
? Interviewee: This one—a professor that I am close to sent me a